1. The Indiana
Restaurant Association opposes food and beverage taxes because
our members know from experience that this tax will be paid by
both diners and the restaurant owners.
Though
it may
seem to be a fair tax because all diners pay the tax, it is not
fair when only one industry is singled out to bear the cost of
additional local spending.
National studies
and recent experience in Indiana show that diners are not the
only ones paying a food and beverage tax. The tax comes out of
the diner’s budget but at the expense of the restaurant industry
and its employees. As diners see their bill increasing they have
many choices and opportunities to keep the bill from rising-
even choosing to see it decline. They can choose less expensive
menu items, fewer menu items, or choose a less expensive dining
experience. Consumers are extremely cost conscious with their
household budget. The recent increase in the price of gasoline
showed a decline in restaurant industry revenue, while
consumption of gasoline was not as effected. There is no doubt
that a food and beverage tax will harm the restaurant industry
in Indiana.
2. From an
economic point of view it does not make sense to harm the
restaurant industry in Indiana.
• It is not good
to tax (harm) an industry that is so labor intensive because it
will effect employment. For each additional one million dollars
spent in eating and drinking establishments, Indiana restaurants
generate an additional 45.6 jobs in the state. Clearly the
opposite is true, for each $1 million dollars the diners shave
off their restaurant bill, Indiana will loose 45.6 jobs.
• It is not good
to tax (harm) an industry that yields benefits to the community.
Every $1.00 spent in restaurants generates an additional $1.19
in sales for other industries in the state. Every dollar not
spent at a restaurant will harm other businesses too.
• It is not good
to tax (harm) an industry that has an extremely low profit
margin. Typically restaurants operate with a 5% profit margin.
If restaurants could raise their prices 1% without losing
customers- they would have done so. Operating on such slim
profit margins, restaurants are vulnerable to losses from
relatively small increases in costs or decreases in revenue.
This is a major reason so many restaurants have a short life.
• It is not good
to tax (harm) an industry that has a very high elasticity of
demand. A small increase in the price of a meal can cause a
diner to spend much less- by choosing less expensive items or a
less expensive restaurant.
3. Raising this
tax will only be a temporary fix to revenue problems but it will
become a permanent tax on an industry.
4. Food &
Beverage taxes are extremely regressive
Most counties
that do not have a food and beverage tax have lower average
income levels and more “working poor” who typically need to dine
out or carry out after work. Every dollar you take from
customers is a dollar that customers no longer have to spend on
food.
The
Indiana Restaurant Association believes that necessities such as
food, shelter and medicine should not be subject to the sales
tax. Family Meals Taxes are extremely regressive because they
tax a basic necessity of life that everyone, regardless of
income, must find some way to include in their budget. The
percentage of household income that food away from home
represents increases as household income decreases. For
households with incomes in the $5,000 to $9,999 range, average
household expenditures on food away from home represent 9.1% of
household income. For households with incomes of $70,000 or
more, it's only 3.6% of household income.
5. An
additional restaurant tax will harm the already suffering
restaurant industry, harm low-income diners and it will
negatively impact jobs and spending in Indiana.
The restaurant
industry has been hit by a “perfect storm” of price pressures.
The economy, rising food prices and higher wages have
exacted a huge toll on Indiana’s restaurant industry. Many
hometown restaurants have closed or are closing their doors.
Nationally, 53 percent of restaurant owners reported a sales
decline and lower customer traffic levels each month during the
first half of 2008. The second half of 2008 will be worse. An
October 2008 report by Technomic Consultants showed:
-
The vast
majority of consumers (91 percent) who are cutting back on
restaurant spending say they are dining out less frequently.
However, one-third (32 percent) are purchasing less
expensive food when eating out, and one-fifth (19 percent)
are ordering smaller amounts and portions.
-
Overall,
consumers are cutting back more at full-service than at
limited-service restaurants. Lower income consumers are
decreasing purchases at both types of venues.
Restaurants are
fighting to keep customers coming in their doors with food
specials and lower prices while costs continue to rise.
Restaurants are
least able to absorb the economic impact of an additional tax. A
small price increase can mean a decrease in sales to a
restaurant when diners decide to purchase less. Any change in
revenue especially in this economy -will hurt the bottom line of
the restaurant and cause employee hours or jobs to be cut.
-
The
restaurant business is highly competitive with a high price
elasticity of demand.
-
Restaurants
operate on a very low profit margin.
-
Restaurants
are very labor intensive with one of the smallest profit per
employee of any industry.
6. The
restaurant business is important to Indiana:
-
Indiana
restaurants are the largest private sector employer in the
state.
-
Indiana
restaurants are a cornerstone of economic development in our
communities. National statistics show that every dollar
spent in an eating-and-drinking place generates $1.98 in
sales for related industries, from farms and factories to
general contractors and truckers, according to the U.S.
Department of Commerce's Bureau of Economic Analysis.
-
Indiana
residents want restaurants as a place to gather, socialize
and supply their basic need for food. Restaurants provide a
quality of life in our communities. In most Indiana cities
restaurants cater to the local citizens. Dining out is a
way of life. More than one-third of all adults (34%) of all
income levels say purchasing takeout is essential to the way
they live and nearly one-half of all adults (43%) say
restaurants are essential to their lifestyle.
(2006 NRA Restaurant Industry Forecast)
http://www.restaurant.org/pdfs/research/Mid-Year_Review_Restaurant_Industry_Economy_July_2008.pdf
http://www.restaurant.org/research/news/story.cfm?ID=311
Misguided Assumptions
-It is not true that only “tourists” would pay the tax – it would mostly be paid by local residents.
-It is not true that only those who can afford it would dine out and pay a food and beverage tax.
-A food and beverage tax is not just pennies.